Arabs Need Not Apply ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Princeton, NJ - Consider for a moment how you might react if a man or woman was not offered a job, or a seat on the bus, simply based on the color of his or her skin? You'd be right to be outraged and call it for what it is...racial prejudice. Unfortunately, fear and ignorance have completely overtaken the facts surrounding the United Arab Emirates effort to obtain American port management contracts. It's disturbing to see some of the names associated with this hysteria and prejudice. One of them is Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ). You might think that as a Hispanic American he would understand how ignorance and fear can lead to prejudice and discrimination. He's certainly been an advocate for racial equality in the past. I guess now, as a candidate for statewide office, he finds his convictions inconvenient. His ambition may be too great to pass up the opportunity to take advantage of the President's abysmal poll numbers, despite the facts. Others include Republican leaders like Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist. That they chose initially to follow poll numbers instead of presenting the facts was not only disappointing, it was incredibly irresponsible. The failure of our elected leaders to educate the electorate by presenting the facts shows a lack of courage and integrity. First of all, the job of securing a port is not the charge or responsibility of the terminal operators. In fact, it's the United States Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and in the case of New Jersey and New York, the NJ/NY Port Authority. Intelligence agencies weighed in before the deal was approved and concluded that the threat was low. There were "no red flags" according to John Negroponte, the national director of intelligence. Secondly, as we now know, China is a major contractor with U.S. ports, managing two of the six terminals at Port Elizabeth in New Jersey. In the mid 1990s, members of the Chinese communist government spoke publicly about using nuclear weapons capable of hitting Los Angeles if the U.S. ever confronted them over Taiwan. Then there was the Chinese espionage scandal and the attempts to infiltrate the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In 2003, Chinese hackers launched operation 'Titan Rain', a massive cyber attack on American Military networks. Despite these hostile actions, none of the vocal critics have mentioned the need to reconsider China's contracts with American ports. Lastly, the U.A.E. is one of America's strongest allies in the War on Terror. U.S. military naval vessels refuel and re-supply out of U.A.E. ports hundreds of times each year. We operate out of six military bases in the U.A.E. The U.A.E allowed us to use their territory to launch Desert Storm and Desert Shield against Iraq in the 1990s. After the 9/11 attacks, the U.A.E. allowed our military to launch operations against the Taliban. At this very moment, American customs agents are operating inside the U.A.E. to ensure that nothing can be smuggled into the United States through their country. Their strong support for America is costly for them. They too have to worry about Al Qaeda attacks. Can you imagine the leaders in the U.A.E. scratching their heads in genuine disbelief over this issue? They must be asking each other, "How could America do this to us? After all we've done for them?" And what is the American political response to her friend? "Arabs need not apply." Our treatment of our friend is not only wrong, it's disgraceful. The media and popular backlash is based in part by a misrepresentation of the facts by many elected leaders. Fear, ignorance and ambition are driving the debate at the expense of a rare alliance in a dangerous time for Americans. We won't win this war alone. Eradicating terrorism will take the support and trust of friends around the globe. We had better start making them.
Thursday, March 19, 2015
#TBT from 2006 - UAE Remains an Important Ally in War on Terror. Right @SenatorMenendez?
Originally Posted on Wednesday March 1, 2006
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
Defending the Faith?
The
recent suspension of Catholic school theology teacher Patricia Jannuzzi who expressed
her opinion on Facebook regarding gay marriage and the silence of
the Diocesan Bishop captures the
essence of how far the Political Correctness has spread in society. According
to recent reports, the school and Church leaders have distanced
themselves from the teacher and it would seem Catholic doctrine as well.
How is it that a Catholic School Theology teacher expressing
a view against gay marriage is inconsistent with the “position” of a Catholic
school? Actors and former students are
lining up against the teacher in the name of tolerance and inclusion. It’s
difficult to digest that a Catholic school founded on the religious principles
of the Catholic faith is demonstrating intolerance of a theology teacher espousing
those same views.
Jannuzzi was left alone to face the media firestorm and the
hateful bigotry of those that claim to represent tolerance. She had to bear the
brunt of expressing ideas that are well documented in Catholic Doctrine. Unfortunately, Patricia Jannuzzi has become a
victim of a much larger battle waged by the forces of political intolerance
who have turned their anger on the basic tenets of Catholic Theology. Many people supporting traditional marriage, specifically between one man and one woman are
labeled intolerant bigots. This issue is certainly coming to a head as the Supreme Court prepares to decide on the issue of a state's right to define marriage. In this highly polarized political atmosphere we've heard that opposition to ‘marriage equality’ is ‘hate speech’ that should be punishable by public
ridicule, scorn and even a loss of income and security.
How can any Catholic have the confidence to stand
up for the teachings of their own Church when the men and women charged with administering
to the faithful lack the courage of their proclaimed convictions? Clearly the Bishop, Monsignor and principal know
what Catholic
Doctrine states regarding sexuality
and marriage.
It’s important to clarify that Jannuzzi’s remarks were made as a defense against an aggressive social media attack on Dr. Ben Carson who made a remark on CNN regarding homosexuality and choice. She was reacting to vulgar language used by a radical anti-Catholic gay activist Dan Savage. She was addressing the very aggressive assault on both her beliefs and a prominent public figure supporting those beliefs.
In today’s politically correct society the Church position on sexuality may be a difficult lesson to absorb for sure. But it is the doctrine of the Church. Having said that, there is clearly room for discussion in the political realm where a diverse collection of people will make room for many different opinions and lifestyles. Perhaps if we were discussing a public school teacher one could argue that bringing religious dogma into the classroom would not be appropriate.
Allowing vulgar, crass anti-Catholic bigots to run roughshod over Catholics courageous enough to actually put in words what the Church has taught for thousands of years is truly destructive to the Church itself. The Somerville Catholic community should be on guard because recent events have exposed that Church leaders will not be there if and when you call for help. Instead they may sacrifice you in the name of tolerance, inclusion and sensitivity.
I understand that these are difficult times for the Church. Even years later many are still reeling from an unfortunate series of events with a small group of wayward predator priests violating sacred vows and US laws. But that is no excuse for cowardice that has left a decent, honest and courageous woman out for the PC wolves to tear apart.
Catholic schools should not be apologizing for their beliefs to radical bullies who want to take down Catholics espousing traditional views. Bishop Bootkoski has an opportunity to right this wrong. He should rise to the occasion and lead the flock. Stand up for the Catholic faith. Stand up to the bullies of political correctness. Defend the weakest members of the diocese. Anything less should cost him, Monsignor Brennan and Principal Kline their jobs.
Vatican Website Catechism:
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm
Patricia Jannuzzi
Suspended: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/14/catholic-teacher-suspended-over-comments-on-homosexuality/
Tweet about
Facebook post: https://twitter.com/GreggyBennett/status/574787184424677378/photo/1
Vulgar Tweet
at Ben Carson: http://www.youngcons.com/crass-gay-activist-tweets-ben-carson-following-cnn-interview/
Sixth
Commandment: http://catholicmoraltheology.com/catechism-commentary-the-sixth-commandment/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)