Arabs Need Not Apply ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Princeton, NJ - Consider for a moment how you might react if a man or woman was not offered a job, or a seat on the bus, simply based on the color of his or her skin? You'd be right to be outraged and call it for what it is...racial prejudice. Unfortunately, fear and ignorance have completely overtaken the facts surrounding the United Arab Emirates effort to obtain American port management contracts. It's disturbing to see some of the names associated with this hysteria and prejudice. One of them is Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ). You might think that as a Hispanic American he would understand how ignorance and fear can lead to prejudice and discrimination. He's certainly been an advocate for racial equality in the past. I guess now, as a candidate for statewide office, he finds his convictions inconvenient. His ambition may be too great to pass up the opportunity to take advantage of the President's abysmal poll numbers, despite the facts. Others include Republican leaders like Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist. That they chose initially to follow poll numbers instead of presenting the facts was not only disappointing, it was incredibly irresponsible. The failure of our elected leaders to educate the electorate by presenting the facts shows a lack of courage and integrity. First of all, the job of securing a port is not the charge or responsibility of the terminal operators. In fact, it's the United States Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and in the case of New Jersey and New York, the NJ/NY Port Authority. Intelligence agencies weighed in before the deal was approved and concluded that the threat was low. There were "no red flags" according to John Negroponte, the national director of intelligence. Secondly, as we now know, China is a major contractor with U.S. ports, managing two of the six terminals at Port Elizabeth in New Jersey. In the mid 1990s, members of the Chinese communist government spoke publicly about using nuclear weapons capable of hitting Los Angeles if the U.S. ever confronted them over Taiwan. Then there was the Chinese espionage scandal and the attempts to infiltrate the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In 2003, Chinese hackers launched operation 'Titan Rain', a massive cyber attack on American Military networks. Despite these hostile actions, none of the vocal critics have mentioned the need to reconsider China's contracts with American ports. Lastly, the U.A.E. is one of America's strongest allies in the War on Terror. U.S. military naval vessels refuel and re-supply out of U.A.E. ports hundreds of times each year. We operate out of six military bases in the U.A.E. The U.A.E allowed us to use their territory to launch Desert Storm and Desert Shield against Iraq in the 1990s. After the 9/11 attacks, the U.A.E. allowed our military to launch operations against the Taliban. At this very moment, American customs agents are operating inside the U.A.E. to ensure that nothing can be smuggled into the United States through their country. Their strong support for America is costly for them. They too have to worry about Al Qaeda attacks. Can you imagine the leaders in the U.A.E. scratching their heads in genuine disbelief over this issue? They must be asking each other, "How could America do this to us? After all we've done for them?" And what is the American political response to her friend? "Arabs need not apply." Our treatment of our friend is not only wrong, it's disgraceful. The media and popular backlash is based in part by a misrepresentation of the facts by many elected leaders. Fear, ignorance and ambition are driving the debate at the expense of a rare alliance in a dangerous time for Americans. We won't win this war alone. Eradicating terrorism will take the support and trust of friends around the globe. We had better start making them.
Thursday, March 19, 2015
#TBT from 2006 - UAE Remains an Important Ally in War on Terror. Right @SenatorMenendez?
Originally Posted on Wednesday March 1, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment