#TBT from 2006 - UAE Remains an Important Ally in War on Terror. Right @SenatorMenendez?

Originally Posted on Wednesday March 1, 2006

Arabs Need Not Apply

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Princeton, NJ - Consider for a moment how you might 
react if a man or woman was not offered a job, or a 
seat on the bus, simply based on the color of his or 
her skin?  You'd be right to be outraged and call it for 
what it is...racial prejudice.

Unfortunately, fear and ignorance have completely 
overtaken the facts surrounding the United Arab 
Emirates effort to obtain American port management 
contracts.  It's disturbing to see some of the names 
associated with this hysteria and prejudice.

One of them is Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ).  You 
might think that as a Hispanic American he would 
understand how ignorance and fear can lead to 
prejudice and discrimination.  He's certainly been an 
advocate for racial equality in the past.  I guess 
now, as a candidate for statewide office, he finds his 
convictions inconvenient.  His ambition may be too 
great to pass up the opportunity to take advantage 
of the President's abysmal poll numbers, despite the 
facts.

Others include Republican leaders like Speaker Dennis 
Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist.  That 
they chose initially to follow poll numbers instead of 
presenting the facts was not only disappointing, it 
was incredibly irresponsible.  The failure of our 
elected leaders to educate the electorate by 
presenting the facts shows a lack of courage and 
integrity.

First of all, the job of securing a port is not the 
charge or responsibility of the terminal operators.  In 
fact, it's the United States Coast Guard, U.S. 
Customs and in the case of New Jersey and New 
York, the NJ/NY Port Authority.  Intelligence agencies 
weighed in before the deal was approved and 
concluded that the threat was low.  There were "no 
red flags" according to John Negroponte, the national 
director of intelligence.

Secondly, as we now know, China is a major 
contractor with U.S. ports, managing two of the six 
terminals at Port Elizabeth in New Jersey.  In the mid 
1990s, members of the Chinese communist 
government spoke publicly about using nuclear 
weapons capable of hitting Los Angeles if the U.S. 
ever confronted them over Taiwan.  Then there was 
the Chinese espionage scandal and the attempts to 
infiltrate the Los Alamos National Laboratory.  In 
2003, Chinese hackers launched operation 'Titan 
Rain', a massive cyber attack on American Military 
networks.  Despite these hostile actions, none of the 
vocal critics have mentioned the need to reconsider 
China's contracts with American ports.

Lastly, the U.A.E. is one of America's strongest allies 
in the War on Terror. U.S. military naval vessels 
refuel and re-supply out of U.A.E. ports hundreds of 
times each year. We operate out of six military bases 
in the U.A.E. The U.A.E allowed us to use their 
territory to launch Desert Storm and Desert Shield 
against Iraq in the 1990s.  After the 9/11 attacks, 
the U.A.E. allowed our military to launch operations 
against the Taliban.  At this very moment, American 
customs agents are operating inside the U.A.E. to 
ensure that nothing can be smuggled into the United 
States through their country.

Their strong support for America is costly for them. 
They too have to worry about Al Qaeda attacks.  
Can you imagine the leaders in the U.A.E. scratching 
their heads in genuine disbelief over this issue?  They 
must be asking each other, "How could America do 
this to us?  After all we've done for them?" And what 
is the American political response to her 
friend?  "Arabs need not apply."

Our treatment of our friend is not only wrong, it's 
disgraceful. The media and popular backlash is based 
in part by a misrepresentation of the facts by many 
elected leaders.  Fear, ignorance and ambition are 
driving the debate at the expense of a rare alliance 
in a dangerous time for Americans.  We won't win 
this war alone.  Eradicating terrorism will take the 
support and trust of friends around the globe.  We 
had better start making them.

Defending the Faith?

     The recent suspension of Catholic school theology teacher Patricia Jannuzzi who expressed her opinion on Facebook regarding gay marriage and the silence of the Diocesan Bishop captures the essence of how far the Political Correctness has spread in society.  According to recent reports, the school and Church leaders have distanced themselves from the teacher and it would seem Catholic doctrine as well.

     How is it that a Catholic School Theology teacher expressing a view against gay marriage is inconsistent with the “position” of a Catholic school?  Actors and former students are lining up against the teacher in the name of tolerance and inclusion.  It’s difficult to digest that a Catholic school founded on the religious principles of the Catholic faith is demonstrating intolerance of a theology teacher espousing those same views. 

     Jannuzzi was left alone to face the media firestorm and the hateful bigotry of those that claim to represent tolerance. She had to bear the brunt of expressing ideas that are well documented in Catholic Doctrine.  Unfortunately, Patricia Jannuzzi has become a victim of a much larger battle waged by the forces of political intolerance who have turned their anger on the basic tenets of Catholic Theology.  Many people supporting traditional marriage, specifically between one man and one woman are labeled intolerant bigots.  This issue is certainly coming to a head as the Supreme Court prepares to decide on the issue of a state's right to define marriage.  In this highly polarized political atmosphere we've heard that opposition to ‘marriage equality’ is ‘hate speech’ that should be punishable by public ridicule, scorn and even a loss of income and security.

     How can any Catholic have the confidence to stand up for the teachings of their own Church when the men and women charged with administering to the faithful lack the courage of their proclaimed convictions?  Clearly the Bishop, Monsignor and principal know what Catholic Doctrine states regarding sexuality and marriage.

   
     It’s important to clarify that Jannuzzi’s remarks were made as a defense against an aggressive social media attack on Dr. Ben Carson who made a remark on CNN regarding homosexuality and choice.  She was reacting to vulgar language used by a radical anti-Catholic gay activist Dan Savage.  She was addressing the very aggressive assault on both her beliefs and a prominent public figure supporting those beliefs.

     In today’s politically correct society the Church position on sexuality may be a difficult lesson to absorb for sure.  But it is the doctrine of the Church.  Having said that, there is clearly room for discussion in the political realm where a diverse collection of people will make room for many different opinions and lifestyles.  Perhaps if we were discussing a public school teacher one could argue that bringing religious dogma into the classroom would not be appropriate. 

     Allowing vulgar, crass anti-Catholic bigots to run roughshod over Catholics courageous enough to actually put in words what the Church has taught for thousands of years is truly destructive to the Church itself.  The Somerville Catholic community should be on guard because recent events have exposed that Church leaders will not be there if and when you call for help.  Instead they may sacrifice you in the name of tolerance, inclusion and sensitivity. 

     I understand that these are difficult times for the Church.  Even years later many are still reeling from an unfortunate series of events with a small group of wayward predator priests violating sacred vows and US laws.  But that is no excuse for cowardice that has left a decent, honest and courageous woman out for the PC wolves to tear apart. 

     Catholic schools should not be apologizing for their beliefs to radical bullies who want to take down Catholics espousing traditional views.  Bishop Bootkoski has an opportunity to right this wrong.  He should rise to the occasion and lead the flock.  Stand up for the Catholic faith.  Stand up to the bullies of political correctness.  Defend the weakest members of the diocese.  Anything less should cost him, Monsignor Brennan and Principal Kline their jobs.

References:

Vatican Website Catechism: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm

Patricia Jannuzzi Suspended: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/14/catholic-teacher-suspended-over-comments-on-homosexuality/

Tweet about Facebook post: https://twitter.com/GreggyBennett/status/574787184424677378/photo/1

Vulgar Tweet at Ben Carson: http://www.youngcons.com/crass-gay-activist-tweets-ben-carson-following-cnn-interview/

Sixth Commandment: http://catholicmoraltheology.com/catechism-commentary-the-sixth-commandment/

It's Time To LOWER The Gas Tax in New Jersey.

"We broke it; don’t know how to fix it and you are just gonna have to keep paying for it."

 - May have been overheard at the State House in Trenton. 

     

     The proponents of the gas tax will tell you that the Transportation Trust Fund is separate from the general fund and needs to be addressed directly.  They’ll tell you that the government’s hands are tied due to the massive debt and legal obligations of paying pensions and benefits.  They’ll tell you the entire $30+ Billion dollar state budget is spoken for so there is simply no choice but to raise another tax. 

     As gas prices rise again after a couple of months of enjoying less than $1.70 a gallon prices in the Garden State, many in the legislature are seriously considering raising the gas tax.  Drivers understandably are upset by the prospect having had only a short while to enjoy really low prices. We've come to expect somewhat lower gas prices in the Garden State partly because of our historically low tax on gas.  The issue is coming to a head now due to the cries from construction unions and civil engineers claiming the hundreds of NJ bridges are in such disrepair we're facing a possible repeat of Minneapolis 2007. And they've got a video to scare you into believing it...   https://www.facebook.com/njallianceaction?fref=photo

     Let’s take it at face value and agree that our aging roads & bridges are in need of a major overhaul.  Although it's unclear exactly how much money would be needed to bring NJ roads & bridges out of the 'scare zone' the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) currently expects more than 1.2 Billion dollars in funding annually.  http://www.state.nj.us/ttfa/faq/  The fund is going to need hundreds of millions more to begin new projects.

     Unfortunately, the money supposedly allocated to the fund is often spent on other state budget priorities and debt service and the fund has to make up the difference through additional borrowing. http://www.njaflcio.org/transportation

     The easy ‘knee-jerk’ reaction from politicians is to seek immediate revenue through a new tax.  After all, if you’re facing potential death on the road, what’s a couple hundred more dollars a year, right?  Gas tax estimates will raise approximately $50 million for every $0.01 of a gas tax increase.  http://www.app.com/story/news/politics/new-jersey/2015/02/09/gas-tax-alternatives-blasted-asinine-asburd/23139887/ According to the state TTF site, current expected minimum revenue from motor fuels tax is set around $500 million.  With dollars diverted to pay debt service it would take another $0.10 in new gas tax revenue to meet that number.

     The challenge from consumers is partially due to opposition to higher costs at the pump in a state that already has among the highest costs of living in the US.  It's also about a lack of trust for the Trenton government's ability to prioritize and allocate tax dollars appropriately.  Remember, it's this same legislature and previous administrations that got us here in the first place.

     Some have suggested shifting dollars from other parts of the budget, namely education and using that money to fix the infrastructure.  Some simply want to blame Governor Christie even though the current state of affairs was set in motion decades ago.  For the most part, Republicans have been very good at throwing up roadblocks to tax hikes without offering a workable solution to fix the problem of continued borrowing.  We've been borrowing and taxing our way into the mess we’re in now for decades.  We need a new plan.  We’re already overtaxed.  And we spend more than we take in annually.  We’re not going to be able to borrow much more money, if any.  The need for government spending especially on transportation is critical for the economic future to get NJ back on a positive financial footing.

     Let’s move past the ‘tax or die’ debate.  There are other possible solutions.  Instead of raising another tax, why not let current consumer demand help raise revenue by creating new business, jobs and opportunity for communities to grow?

Here are two short term solutions:

Sports Betting Revenue

     The opportunity to capitalize on the bi-partisan support for legalized sports betting in NJ may be the fastest solution to raise revenue and start fixing our aging transportation infrastructure.  Legalize it and spread the wealth and the revenue across bars and restaurants throughout New Jersey.  If the FBI estimates on illegal betting revenue are accurate, there's enough potential revenue to immediately begin funding the TTF with revenue instead of borrowed dollars without raising the gas tax.

     Since there's a bond required for a liquor license holders under current regulations, there’s already an enforcement mechanism and process in place to protect the consumer.  According to State Senator Ray Lesniak, the FBI reports that the revenue from illegal betting is between $500-600 million. http://www.njtvonline.org/news/video/sen-lesniak -sports-betting-would-bring-revenue-to-the-state/ 

Although he does qualify the number by saying it’s undetermined how much would find its way to the state coffers.  

     The point is that a legal sports betting program that was open to bars and restaurants could send the revenue number through the roof.  More businesses will profit and expand creating more jobs and increasing the revenue to the state indirectly in addition to the gaming tax.  Let’s face it, the only reason illegal gambling is flourishing is that the government has prevented private business from capitalizing on the incredibly high demand for betting.

Opt Out of Common Core

     New Jersey already has some of the best schools in the nation.  http://www.northjersey.com/news/nj-students-surpass-many-countries-in-ranking-of-test-scores-across-world-1.607220 The new Common Core directive from the Federal government has met with stiff opposition from parents and teachers. Opting out would be both practical from a political and financial perspective.  An unlikely ally for sure, The NJEA is already funding an all-out assault on the assessment component of Common Core, the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) test.

     Several states have already opted out of Common Core altogether due to the cost, testing, accountability and privacy issues. http://www.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=3758244 

Given the specific concerns with the PARCC tests and the united opposition from conservative school choice groups like Eagle Forum and the teachers union, opting out would be a relatively popular position taken by the Trenton government.  This certainly wouldn’t hurt Governor Christie as he looks to 2016.  The test itself might be a wedge issue on a national level with the current Administration in Washington.  

   How would this help eliminate the need for a gas tax hike?  The biggest benefit would be the hundreds of millions of dollars saved by NJ which could be allocated going forward for Transportation.  The estimated cost of the implementation of common core testing and standards in NJ is as high as $450 million dollars. http://www.app.com/story/news/education/2014/10/06/common-core-debate-nj/16832533/  This is nearly the amount of revenue needed for the TTF expected revenue from a new gas tax.

Here are a few ideas to fix the long term problem of financial stability in the Garden State:

Remove gaming license restrictions to enable and empower smaller venues to capitalize on gaming demand and revenue. 

     The model of the big casino developer attracting people to one destination has failed in NJ.  And it failed miserably.  Casino after casino are folding in Atlantic City.  http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/22/us-usa-atlantic-city-emergency-idUSKBN0KV1RL20150122 Millions of dollars that could’ve and should've been focused on rebuilding the transportation infrastructure were squandered on propping up a failed business model.  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/02/20/chris-christie-s-bad-bet-casino-that-received-taxpayer-funds-to-file-for-bankruptcy/ 

     Enough already.  Las Vegas is successful as a destination without an ocean or millions within a short drive.  The streets are clean and crime is relatively low for a big city.  What are they doing right?  One of the main success stories in Vegas are the small businesses who directly benefit from the gaming demand.  There are slot machines and electronic gaming machines in the airport and in diners across the city.  The market meets the demand in tandem with the big developers.  Small business and big developers are not mutually exclusive.  Imagine slot machines in Wildwood and in the Meadowlands retaining those NJ residents and the revenue we're currently losing to our neighbors?

Change collective bargaining for state workers and teachers so that benefits are negotiated locally.

     This is essentially what Governor Walker did through Act 10 in Wisconsin.  The state was facing a $3.6 billion deficit when he took office in 2010. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/08/12/its-working-in-wisconsin-high-court-upholds-act-10/   Without raising taxes, the state has enjoyed a surplus in each subsequent year. 

     The plan took collective bargaining for many government workers and teachers off the table and forced the unions to negotiate locally.  What's interesting is by allowing local communities to decide how to spend dollars to attract and retain teachers, starting teacher salaries rose in some places after implementation. http://walker.wi.gov/wisconsin-priority/reforming-government/reforms-and-results/act-10-reform-updates  This did not impact Fire Fighters and Police unions.  http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2013/aug/02/context-walker-extending-act-10-police-firefighter/

     Local negotiations by school boards and municipal leaders accountable directly to the voters put the parents and taxpayers back in control.  Enabling choice in health plans and eliminating forced dues created opportunity for teachers to excel and benefit for being a good teacher.  The bill was a win for teachers, students and taxpayers. http://watchdog.org/63485/wirep-exclusive-analysis-finds-wisconsins-act-10-saving-taxpayers-big/  Sounds like exactly what we need in New Jersey.

     Despite heavily funded attacks from organized labor, Wisconsin’s Governor won three elections in four years and became the first Governor in the US to survive a recall. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Governors/2012/0606/Gov.-Scott-Walker-makes-history-survives-Wisconsin-recall-election-video 

     Seems that the voters who increased his margin of victory in the recall vote liked what they got and experienced the positive results first-hand.  Unemployment has dropped below six percent as the state continues to offer tax relief for small businesses.  Incidentally, businesses in Wisconsin polled 90% on the question of whether the state was headed in the right direction. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2012/mar/11/scott-walker/gov-scott-walker-says-94-percent-wisconsin-employe/

Change defined benefit pensions to defined contribution for state workers going forward. 

     The very idea that there are more than 100,000 people employed by the state not including hospitals and cops has helped create an unsustainable drain on the NJ economy.  Add to that the fact that they will all be expecting pensions and benefits long into retirement and you area nearing an irreversible financial crisis. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

     The main issue is that government workers in New Jersey have been promised a defined benefit for their years of service.  There is tremendous resistance to implementing a defined contribution with a variable benefit.  The reality is that workers who are promised payment s when they retire may not be able to collect because the system will eventually run out of the funds to keep up with the demand. There is an estimated $90 Billion in future liabilities from current state workers (this includes first responders) and that number will only continue to rise. http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/14/08/11/explainer-why-state-s-unfunded-liability-for-retirees-is-90-billion-and-rising/   

     Combined with an $85 billion dollar debt http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-13/new-jersey-bond-obligations-rose-less-than-1-to-41-8-billion  that we have to service, the state simply lacks the revenue to pay for what it has promised without making a dramatic change.

Instead of looking at the current liability and negotiating recipients down, why not start fresh with the new employees coming in?  401k plans with a defined contribution and a company match work in the private sector as a way of attracting and retaining talent. There is no reason for government not to adopt a similar system for the benefit of its employees and the taxpayers footing the bill.   It’s as simple as an employee contribution and a government match. http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_40.htm

Let’s Get Going Then.

     Seems simple enough. 

     Generate new revenue from new business which will meet the rising demand for gambling.  Opt out of an increasingly unpopular education program without hurting education and spend the money on the roads.  Open up gambling to the rest of NJ by eliminating the failed state-protected monopoly of big casino developers.  Restructure union negotiations by following the lead of a successful model which is both politically viable and economically practical. Redefine benefits for future government employees by modeling after successful private sector companies.

     We should be talking about capping the gas tax at a lower rate than today.  The proposed increase would barely be a drop in the bucket and we’ll be back at the debate a year from now.  It’s time for a some simple but dramatic changes in New Jersey.

     

     Who speaks for the rest of us in New Jersey?  Those without guaranteed government income, without huge legal contracts with government entities, without the unchecked financial power of forced union dues?   Which politician will stand up and be counted?  Who will speak for us; the over-taxed, over-burdened resident of New Jersey who just wants to make a living and stay in the state we love?  Commonsense, practical solutions ready to be championed by someone who has the courage and the integrity to forge ahead. 

     Many are moving out.  I’m digging in and staying.   Many have an exit plan prepared for after the kids graduate.  I’d like to be here for the long haul.  We’re only a few changes away from fixing the problem.  Call your legislators and tell ‘em to get back to work.  There’s plenty to do and only a limited window of opportunity.

Reality Check on Zimmerman Verdict

It's always a terrible tragedy when a young life is lost.  So many kids die every year senselessly; wrong place, wrong time, wrong crowd...etc.  Watching the outrage and publicity stunts over the weekend from so many celebrities and activists it occurred to me that maybe a cold dose of reality is in order...

Where's the outrage on behalf of the lawful role played by a neighborhood watch leader in a community that had experienced several robberies and crimes in the past with many more prevented because of the diligence of the watch?

Where's the outrage on behalf of a law abiding citizen, exonerated by a jury of his peers, who lost months of his life in hiding?  How about the enormous financial, emotional and physical cost for this man and his family?   Not to mention the threats, past and present, all for conducting his lawful role of patrolling and protecting his community.

Where's the outrage on behalf of ousted former Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee?  Seems that he may have been right all along...shouldn't he be the first to be reinstated?

Where's the outrage on behalf of the tens of thousands of young people who are in harms way and often killed in America's most dangerous cities, a few right here in the Garden State,  with no hope of rising above the commonplace crime and gang culture?

Did you notice that some of the same people who celebrated the OJ verdict are now condemning this one?  Seems that there  might be racism involved...but where I wonder?  Would there be the same outcry if Zimmerman were African-American?  OR if Martin wasn't?

And perhaps the most egregious point being raised is the ignorant comparison by Zimmerman detractors to Medgar Evers.  Have any of these folks read history?  Evers was a champion who served his country and spoke out against terrible racial injustice only to be murdered for his principles.  This case isn't that...not even close.

Can't help but wonder why, if this was so simple a case of profiling and racism, as the current protesters claim,  media and activist groups felt compelled to alter the presentation of the 911 call recordings to paint a distorted picture?   The disinformation campaign continued when the picture used to portray the shooting victim was that of a ten year old innocent looking boy used repeatedly to drive emotions against Zimmerman before the trial even began...Of course this was all rejected when the facts & evidence came out in court...the battered back of Zimmerman's head for starters...

I understand that this is a hot emotional issue, but lets get to the root of it...people are upset because another young life ended too early...they should be.  But the circumstances, the laws, and the jury shed light on another angle of this story.  The one that shows another victim whose name is George Zimmerman.  

Evidence points to a thoughtful man, dedicating his time to serving his community.  He was put in a position where he had to make serious decisions in seconds and maybe, just maybe if he didn't fear for his life while his head was being bashed into the sidewalk, he would have made different decisions and Martin would be alive today.

Let's have the discussion about Stand-Your-Ground laws, whether community watches should be armed, whether race is a legit issue in similar cases, but for this case, make no mistake...justice was served. 

@BillSpadea

Tribute to Howard Phillips, Champion of Liberty

Below is the text of a letter I wrote for my friend Howard Phillips several years ago marking the 35th anniversary of his leadership at the Conservative Caucus.  Howard passed away yesterday leaving behind a long legacy of patriotism, vigilance and commitment to God, family and country.  He leaves behind a strong family and a Movement that will always be in his debt.  Thank you, Howard, for your long life of sacrifice for duty, honor and country.  Rest in peace my friend.

October 7, 2009

Richard Norman, President

The Richard Norman Company

44084 Riverside Parkway, Suite 350

Leesburg, VA  20176

Dear Richard,

Thank you for the opportunity to write a few words on behalf of my good friend Howard Phillips.  Howard has been an inspiration to me for the better part of my 40 years on earth and helping him celebrate the accomplishment of the 35 years that he and the Conservative Caucus have been fighting for our liberty is a true honor.

I first met Howard through my father, Dominick Spadea, who joined with him to build the Conservative Movement in New Jersey during the 1970’s.  Some of my earliest memories as a child were from attending meetings with my Dad and Howard as they planned to fight the sell-out of American interests at the Panama Canal and the SALT treaty that Howard was instrumental in defeating. Howard's vision and action fighting that treaty in 1979 paved the way for the Reagan election in 1980 and the ultimate collapse of the USSR.  History will remember Howard Phillips as a key general, helping our nation win the Cold War.

Years later, when I served as a National Director with Young Americans for Freedom and then as National Chairman of the College Republican National Committee, Howard was the inspirational ‘thought-leader’ that I would turn to for advice and counsel.  He was always available to discuss and support the effort to keep the Republican Party honest and on the ‘Right’ track.  When I was “unceremoniously dumped” by the establishment GOP for publishing Howard’s articles in our newspaper, he graciously and eagerly opened his doors, enabling me and a small band of conservative ‘street-fighters’ to continue the battle for our ideas and Movement throughout my term.  Howard never asked for anything in return except that we stay true to our principles.

When I ran for U.S. Congress in my home state of New Jersey, despite the overwhelming odds and his own lack of funding, Howard stepped up to help; both contributing financially and making key introductions to conservative leaders in the region.  His consistent confidence and appreciation for young leaders is appreciated by an entire generation of conservatives who will have to carry the torch of liberty during the decades to come, facing the ultimate test from the far-Left, anti-American zealots who now rule in Washington. 

When the Republican Party was headed toward defeat in a U.S Senate contest a few years after my first run, it was Howard who called and wrote in an effort to encourage me to enter the race and continue the fight for our principles.  He’s never given up his enthusiasm, energy and commitment to encourage candidates to run for the right reasons; and he always backs it up with real support.

Howard Phillips is a great patriot, having spent a lifetime sacrificing his own material opportunities for the good of the Cause.  To know Howard is to know a modern version of the patriots that fought at Lexington and Concord as well as those that debated in Philadelphia through the hot, muggy summer of 1776 to forge this great nation.

Howard Phillips is a friend, a mentor, a patriot and a true ‘Champion of Liberty’.  It’s an honor to congratulate him on a lifetime of achievement - leading our Movement, championing our ideas and encouraging the next generation to take up the fight.  America is a better place because of the sacrifices that Howard Phillips has made personally and has inspired others to make.

We wish him good health and God speed as he prepares for the next 35 years leading the Conservative Caucus!

Yours in Liberty,

Bill Spadea

Bill Spadea

Winning One for the Gipper

Mitt Romney is on his way to a decisive victory on November 6^th.  He’s got momentum and has closed the polling gap in just about every swing state with less than two weeks to go.  The incumbent President has failed in three attempts to make a clear case for his re-election.  Instead he’s used his time in our living rooms to spout the tired rhetoric of class warfare and the welfare state, while the economy and our position in the world crumbles. 

One of the signs that victory is near is the grumbling of some movement conservatives in the blogosphere about the ‘moderate Mitt Romney’.  They're seemingly resigned to the fact that we’re about to elect another George Bush – either one or two – pick your big government President.

Don’t you believe it!  It’s true that Governor Romney was elected in liberal Massachusetts and fathered his own version of government health care.  It’s also true that he appeals to independents and some disaffected Democrats because he’s not a Tea Party conservative.  What’s important now, however, is that he’s going to win.  When he does it will usher in a new era of conservative leadership and governance.  The Movement comeback began with the congressional victories in 2010 and continued with the recall victory of Scott Walker. 

Beginning in January 2013, the Republican Party will be dominated by free market, liberty-minded, value-voter conservatives all responsible for the Romney election.  In 1980, conservatives were energized with Reagan’s victory but unfortunately with the selection of Bush and the influence in the cabinet by the Neo-Cons, victory was short-lived.

Unlike Reagan, Romney moved Right and selected a strong, leading conservative as his running mate whose political identity was based on a budget that is essentially the antithesis of the Great Society.  The die was cast immediately upon than decision.

Given the influence of the Republican Study Committee in the House and the conservative leaders in the Senate, future President Romney will very likely keep a center-right course regarding nominations and government spending because the entirety of the GOP leadership in the House and Senate are far more conservative than we've seen in decades – including the 1994 Contract with America Members.

It’s taken the better part of the past two years since the 2010 victories to refocus the party on nominating candidates that have two critical qualities.  First that they can grasp core conservative principles and second that they can win.  Christine O’Donnell was a product of a very angry and motivated Tea Party movement focused first and foremost on ridding the GOP of liberal, compromising big government, shoulda-been-a-Democrat office holders like Mike Castle.  That was Phase One.  Phase Two was to replace them with thoughtful, electable strong conservatives.  Marco Rubio, Mike Lee, Rand Paul, and Pat Toomey are all cut from the cloth of reigning in government and righting the ship of state.  They also have enough broad appeal to be elected, at least in the case of PA and FL, in moderate, swing states.    

It’s clear that even without a majority, The GOP leaders in the United States Senate when Mitt Romney is inaugurated will be much more conservative than those that held office during Ronald Reagan’s first term.

In 1992 I worked for then President George H. W. Bush as the campaign’s national youth director.  It was increasingly difficult as the campaign recovered from the debate performances and an unfocused four years to energize young conservatives for the incumbent.  Higher taxes, new business regulations, increased government spending, all signs of a weak incumbent governing to the center-left and ready for the exit.  The national GOP never seemed to fully recover, nominating moderate Bob Dole in 1996 and then eight years of domestic spending under George W. Bush, effectively re-branding our party, followed by the nomination of moderate ‘maverick’ John McCain.  This year however is very different.  The party today stands on the precipice of victory, with a united front and a focused clear message about limiting the size and scope of government and bringing about the prosperity that only a free market can deliver.

As much as Mitt Romney’s experience is to get along across the aisle, there’s a good chance – despite the negative press surrounding Todd Akin – that the GOP will not only hold the House, but possibly take control of the Senate.  We’re potentially 13 days from having a President who clearly understands the need for free markets and American strength abroad.  He’s also unique with his appeal to the center because of his experience and demeanor.  Combine that with a conservative dominated House and Senate and you have a true recipe for the final winding down of the 1960’s welfare state. 

This win and subsequent ascendancy of free market conservatives represented by new Vice President Paul Ryan will solidify the dominance of conservatives at the helm of the GOP for a long time to come.

And all this at a time when state voters are throwing out the big government leaders and electing GOP governors like Scott Walker, Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley, Bob McDonnell, and Chris Christie.

 

The future is indeed bright and this year provides the perfect opportunity, not only to win one for the Gipper, but to truly finish what he started when he first ran for the White House more than thirty years ago.

# # #